Flight 19 & The Bermuda Triangle

I was reading Wikipedia last night, as I often do after I’ve settled into bed.

I have a huge fascination with early oceanic aviation, particularly that of the US Navy during WWII. It is incredible to me how these pilots would head out over the open ocean in a small aircraft with the kinds of navigational equipment they had at the time.

For whatever reason, I wanted to read about Flight 19 – the story of 5 TBM Avengers lost on December 5, 1945 during a routine training mission off the coast of Fort Lauderdale, FL. They never did find the bodies or aircraft.

Their route was to take off from NAS Fort Lauderdale (modern day KFLL Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport) at a heading of 091 degrees, fly for 56 NM to Chickens Shoals, drop their bombs, continue on 091 degrees for 67 NM, turn left to 365 degrees for 73 NM, finally turning left to 241 degrees for 120 NM back to NAS Fort Lauderdale.

Somehow, they got lost and disappeared without a trace. Worse, a PBM Mariner flying boat sent to look for them exploded off the coast losing more men.

I don’t have a TDM in the sim, so I opted to fly their training route today in a period-correct F6F-5 – alone.

I did my dead reckoning calculations for my Hellcat’s cruise speed, wrote them down and took off.

At the correct waypoint timing, I arrived here at, what I’m guessing is their bomb target (which is narrow and ship-like):

I continued on for the requisite 67 NM, which brought me to a point out over the ocean with absolutely no visual references whatsoever. I turned left on to 346 degrees and plotted on.

As expected, I over flew Grand Bahama island:

At my next waypoint, I turned onto my final heading of 241 degrees and headed back to Fort Lauderdale.

I was completely blown away when I arrived right there with KFLL at 11:00!

No one knows what, exactly, happened on that fateful flight, but it sounds like their flight leader’s compass failed and he became disoriented and lost. Received radio transmissions revealed other members of the flight felt strongly that they just needed to fly west to find Florida, but the flight leader was adamant they were somewhere else.

Flying the F6F-5 was challenging for me. I find the early directional compass that doesn’t have a modern rotating card, confusing to use. I kept finding myself wanting to turn in the opposite direction to make course corrections, which I just couldn’t get my head around. I had to adjust for gyro drift, too, and keeping the aircraft trimmed, so I could relax a bit. I felt like I had a lot to do to just maintain my course and keep the aircraft straight and level, which was stressful and a bit tiring.

For my next try, I’d like to set up a more challenging weather profile and see how I do.

8 Likes

Now we know where you get all your “facts” from :laughing:

Only jesting. Don’t flame me! :angel:

1 Like

I think they probably got lost when turning

1 Like

Fun fact… they found one of the planes, it crashed on land and the navy confirmed to the person who found it that it was from flight 19, but after that they went quiet about it.

When was it found?

In the beginning of Spielberg’s iconic film “Close encounters of the third kind”, all flight 19 aircraft are found back in the Sonora desert…

pretty sure 1986… could be wrong though

Even spookier, one time in the 80s, the USS Nimitz disappeared through a portal storm and ended up just outside Oahu, Hawaii in the early 1940s. They had to decide whether they wanted to alter the course of history but it became too late as another portal storm swept through and brought the Nimitz back to the modern day.

The Nimitz today can be found patrolling the high seas keeping America safe. But very few people know the full story of an accidental mission in 1980…

4 Likes

Haha!

Yes, jokes are all good with me.

Regarding Wikipedia, I asked the collegiate librarian I am married to, what the library’s current take on Wikipedia is:

  • Ok to use as a starting point for research
  • Use the bibliography to find more sources
  • Very good on some subjects where there is an expert contribution
  • Missing some information, but you don’t know what!

There you have it, straight from the professionals!

1 Like

To my knowledge this was the plot of a fiction based film from around 1980 called ‘The Final Countdown’.

Unless, of course, you know different … :slightly_smiling_face:

ssshhhhhhhhhh youre ruining it :stuck_out_tongue:

2 Likes

Would you be able to share your nav log??? :slight_smile: pleeeeease

First, let me go over some aircraft performance figures. Apologies if any of this minutia is tedious or boring to you.

I haven’t flown the F6F much, at all, since I picked it up recently. I’m starting to fly it, but I have found a number of things confusing between Flying Iron’s specifications and those found in an original F6F Pilot’s Handbook that includes the F6F-5. They say they built it to be flown by the book, so that’s what I’m doing — going by the book when there is a discrepancy in data.

I flew with full fuel tanks and a full drop tank to simulate a bomb load.

On the tablet, FI says a cruise speed of 239 knots, so I made my calculations at this rate. The
Pilot’s Handbook doesn’t offer a max cruise speed, rather it says to cruise at 135 knots for maximum range or 125 knots for maximum endurance. Both of those speeds are a far cry from 239 knots. I went with 239 for the sake of four full fuel tanks!

I flew at a low altitude, which means, according to the US Navy “Rule for Cruising”:

  • Maintain 34” manifold pressure (but not more) or full throttle, if above critical altitude. Control IAS by adjusting RPM. Do not exceed 2250 RPM in neutral blower. Use Auto-Lean at all times unless shift to Auto-Rich is necessary to control cylinder head temperatures.

I had to have open oil cooler flaps due to the ambient. Cowl flaps were closed. Intercooler flaps closed, as they were unnecessary with the blower in neutral.

Even at the max cruise power setting (34” @ 2250 RPM) I was not hitting 239 Knots, which was probably due to my operating weight, but I was close/fast enough that my calculations worked out ok, anyhow.

I had live weather of high ambient temps, calm winds and partly cloudy skies. If the winds are more severe, you’re going to need to adjust accordingly.

  • Take off KFLL
  • Fly heading 091° for 56 NM: 14 mins
  • Continue heading 091° for 67 NM: 17 mins
  • Turn left heading 364° for 73 NM: 19 mins
  • Turn left heading 241° for 120 NM: 30 mins
  • Land KFLL
1 Like

Great film. It’s a brilliant concept, even ignoring the plot loophole about needing to establish communication with musical tones and then returning specimens (airmen) who they’ve presumably been studying and already learning to communicate with…

1 Like

A quality many pilots today have problems with. Manual flight with little visual reference is really difficult and exhausting.

1 Like

Lovely, a thread with some supernatural touch. And also very inspiring! Thank you for reminding me of the legendary Bermuda triangle, time to plan some awesome eighties flight with one of the early Airbusses through the Bermuda triangle.

To make things a bit more thrilling a few unexplainable system failures can be planned, with all navigation systems (including the GNADIRS) except the magnetic compass failing.
Legends say the Tomcats of the Nimitz are still hunting these Mitsubishi Zeroes somewhere inside the triangle.